Customers Rate Fast-Casual and QSR Restaurants Similarly | ConvenienceStoreNews
0
Favorite this article 

Quick Stats

Quick Stats

    Poll

    Poll

    With data breaches on the rise, have you taken steps to make your company’s data more secure?

    Customers Rate Fast-Casual and QSR Restaurants Similarly

    CHICAGO -- Operators in the fast-casual restaurant segment tend to distinguish themselves from fast-feeders by highlighting their higher-quality offerings, more sophisticated atmosphere, and enhanced service at prices that aren't much higher than those at quick-service restaurants (QSRs). However, new research from Technomic Inc. reveals that customers don't necessarily make those distinctions between the two.

    Using data from its ongoing Consumer Brand Metrics: Restaurants study, which tracks consumer attitudes on more than 60 attributes of a restaurant visit, Technomic’s new Understanding Fast-Casual Restaurants and Their Consumers report shows that while consumers have generally higher expectations for fast-casual outlets -- except when it comes to takeout capacity -- their expectations are not largely different than those they have for quick-service chains.

    For instance, 94 percent of customers rate food quality as important or very important when deciding which fast-casual restaurant to visit, compared to 92 percent of those who rate it similarly when deciding on a QSR, a difference of just 2 percentage points. Similarly, there is only a 3-percentage-point difference between fast casual and QSR in the number of customers who value atmosphere and service as important or very important for each segment.

    Additionally, while customers rate fast-casual restaurants higher than QSRs, when it comes to their actual performance in terms of food quality, atmosphere and service, there is only a slight difference. According to Technomic, this suggests that fast-casual operators should question whether their differentiators are enough to make them stand out from fast food.

    0
    Favorite this article 

    Related Content

    Related Content
    Page execution time was 3708.46 ms. Memory used at: devel_boot()=4.01 MB, devel_shutdown()=56.34 MB, PHP peak=57.25 MB.